


The way that we interpret a text, that is, the way we gain meanings from it, intrigued these thinkers. They wanted to know, for example, how we came to 'know' what, say, the word 'hero' meant. They were intrigued by the realisation that the meaning from such a word was intimately tied up with another word, 'coward'. It was as if the two words were somehow in 'binary opposition' to each other, each relying on the other to help out or provide its own meaning.
They also recognised that words in themselves had no inherent meaning at all - that what meaning they did contain was the product of the societies and cultures that used them. The idea that words rely on their 'opposites' and that their meaning is a product of culture or society is at the heart of binary opposition. If this seems complex, all will become clear.
Many of our society's most enduring ideas are maintained and reinforced by the fact that their meanings are created by the workings of binary opposition. For example, if you reflect on what the three pairs of terms in the above images mean to you, wealth and poverty, youth and age, body and soul, you should begin to see how the meaning of each term is created, and - very importantly - shaped, by the existence of not of the word itself but by the existence of the binary pair. Our attitude towards youth, for example, is shaped massively by our attitude towards age: and these are ingrained attitudes properly called ideologies. It seems as if, in all cultures, that people are brought up to need a term or thing's opposite to understand what that thing fully means.
All rather obvious you might say. Is that all there is to it? No... there is much more; and the implications of this understanding are extraordinary and vast. What will not be so immediately obvious at this stage is what this understanding means at a deeper level, for not just meaning but feeling - emotion - that becomes involved in the generation of meaning. In the case of poverty and wealth, you will recognise that we tend to judge a poor person negatively simply because they are not wealthy; we might well feel sympathy for that person, but in very real ways, we will hold to our deeply conditioned negative response to the idea of poverty and transfer this negativity to the poor person.
Think of any other two binary opposites and you will see the same effect occurs. Somehow, one term - one half of each binary pair - creates a more positive feeling (a kind of positive 'spin') than does its opposite counterpart.
There are three stages to this theory that you need to grasp:
Confused? Don't worry, enlightenment - and higher marks - are merely a few web pages away!